The proposed constitutional reform in the Democratic Republic of the Congo is stirring deep divisions, particularly within religious circles. While Pentecostal churches endorse the government’s initiative, the Catholic Church is urging caution, warning against undermining the country’s hard-won democratic gains.

This split comes as the reform process advances, with lawmakers recently approving a referendum bill to put key changes to a national vote.

Pentecostal leaders champion constitutional changes

Advocates of the reform, including prominent Pentecostal figures, argue that the current 2006 Constitution no longer reflects the institutional needs of the country. Archbishop Evariste Ejiba Yamampia, who heads the umbrella organization of Pentecostal churches in the DRC, sees the revision as a critical step toward better governance and development.

“This is about national sovereignty, effective governance, and unlocking our people’s potential. With these changes, we can put an end to bloated entities draining public resources and finally harness our nation’s wealth for sustainable progress,” he stated.

Catholic Church warns against democratic backsliding

The National Episcopal Conference of the Congo (CENCO) has yet to take an official stance, but the Catholic Apostolate of Lay People in the Congo (CALCC) has emphasized the importance of preserving the existing constitutional framework. They view it as the cornerstone of the DRC’s fragile democracy.

“The Constitution remains the bedrock of our young democracy. We have consistently called for dialogue and wisdom in governance. Power, as we’ve always taught, is a service to the people. Citizens—both Catholic and otherwise—must remain vigilant to protect these democratic foundations,” affirmed Faustin Onombili, CALCC president.

Political opposition amplifies tensions

The constitutional debate has spilled into the political arena, with opposition groups accusing President Félix Tshisekedi of attempting to tailor institutions to his political advantage. The Article 64 Coalition, a prominent opposition bloc, had planned to file legal challenges but postponed action to focus on organizing a protest outside Parliament.

As the referendum looms, the divide over the reform deepens—pitting those who advocate for institutional modernization against defenders of the 2006 constitutional order.