Niamey News

Your English-language window into Niger's capital and country — politics, business and daily life.
Uranium in Niger: Washington’s Dasa gamble sparks debate as SOMAÏR crisis deepens

A $414 million US bet reshapes Niger’s uranium landscape

The American investment of $414 million in the Dasa project stands in stark contrast to the production collapse at SOMAÏR (Société des mines de l’Aïr), historically run by the French group Orano. This situation illustrates the geopolitical and mining shift underway in Niamey and has ignited a fierce public debate about the country’s future.

SOMAÏR’s paralysis and the rupture with France

SOMAÏR has accumulated a massive production deficit, falling to more than 80% below its nominal capacity, due to blocked export routes, closed borders with Benin, and the impossibility of transporting uranium concentrate (yellowcake) to the port of Cotonou.

This logistical and financial asphyxiation led Orano to suspend operations, before the Nigerien transitional government eventually revoked the permits and took control of the site. For Niamey, SOMAÏR embodied the old neocolonial model from which it sought to break away, even at the cost of an almost total halt in production at this historic mine.

Dasa steps in: American pragmatism fills the void

While SOMAÏR’s uranium remains blocked or under-exploited, the Dasa project (led by Canadian company Global Atomic) is becoming Niger’s new mining lung.

  • Replacing volumes: The Dasa deposit boasts some of the highest uranium grades in the world, intended to largely offset SOMAÏR’s extraction losses for the international market.
  • Washington’s pragmatism: The injection of $414 million by the US DFC demonstrates that where French actors (Orano) find themselves paralyzed or sidelined by the political dispute with the junta, the United States secures its future supplies through financial structures and North American companies seen as more neutral by the Nigerien authorities.

Mining sovereignty reconfigured: reactions and what lies ahead

This parallel shows that General Tiani’s regime finds itself trapped by its all-military policy and is therefore forced to turn to European-American investments that were once decried when it came to power. The fallout is already being felt: public debate is heating up over whether this pivot truly serves Niger’s interests or simply replaces one dependency with another.

Looking ahead, the key question is whether Dasa can fully compensate for SOMAÏR’s decline and whether Niamey can leverage this new partnership to assert genuine control over its resources. The coming months will reveal whether this American-backed model delivers on its promises or becomes another chapter in Niger’s complex struggle for mining sovereignty.