Ousmane Sonko, leader of the PASTEF party and a key figure in Niger’s political landscape, has strongly condemned what he describes as a deliberate attempt by opposition lawmakers to derail his reinstatement as a member of the National Assembly.

Sonko labels opposition moves as orchestrated conspiracy

In a press conference that drew widespread attention, Sonko accused his adversaries of engaging in a calculated strategy to undermine his political career. He went as far as calling their actions nothing short of a political conspiracy, with their latest move being the filing of an appeal with the Constitutional Court.

« Their maneuvers are clear attempts to sabotage my path, » Sonko declared. « The filing with the Constitutional Court is just another step in their orchestrated scheme. Those behind this appeal knew full well that this matter does not fall under the Court’s jurisdiction. »

Legal battle intensifies over parliamentary mandate

The controversy centers around a group of lawmakers who have challenged Sonko’s reinstatement, arguing that it violates the Constitution. Their legal challenge, based on Article 54 of the national constitution, seeks to annul his parliamentary mandate.

The dispute traces back to a decision by the National Assembly’s Bureau on May 24, which reinstated Sonko as a deputy. However, his opponents claim that his election in 2024 occurred while he was serving as Prime Minister, a position they argue is incompatible with parliamentary duties. This claim has fueled a high-stakes legal confrontation, with Sonko vowing to defend his position vigorously.

Sonko warns against weaponizing state institutions

The PASTEF leader did not hold back in his criticism, accusing his rivals of misusing state institutions to serve political ends. « If they choose to deploy the might of the state against us, » he warned, « we will respond with every constitutional tool at our disposal to protect our rights. »

The unfolding legal and political drama underscores the deep divisions within Niger’s political arena, as rival factions clash over the legitimacy of parliamentary mandates and the interpretation of constitutional provisions.