Cameroon’s mobile phone tax: a barrier to digital inclusion

A new levy on mobile devices risks undermining the country’s digital ambitions by making connectivity less accessible.

Across Africa, countries that have successfully bridged the digital divide did so by first expanding network coverage and lowering device costs. This enabled millions to participate in the digital economy. Yet Cameroon has taken a divergent path by imposing a 33.33% tax on mobile phones—effectively charging citizens for the privilege of staying connected.

This decision transforms what should be a tool for economic empowerment into a financial burden. For a handset valued at 1,670 FCFA, the tax adds nearly 560 FCFA, while a premium smartphone incurs a charge of up to 45,000 FCFA. These are not minor fees—they represent real barriers for families already struggling to afford basic technology.

From ambition to contradiction: how policy undermines progress

Government officials frequently highlight digital transformation as a national priority. They speak of expanding connectivity, fostering innovation, and integrating technology into everyday life. Yet the same administration has just introduced a measure that directly counters these goals.

Taxing mobile phones is not a policy for digital growth—it is one for digital exclusion.

  • Students who rely on online learning face higher costs to access education.
  • Traders using Mobile Money for transactions see their profit margins shrink.
  • Farmers checking market prices must now pay more just to use their phones.
  • Informal workers accessing public services digitally confront an added financial hurdle.

For millions in Cameroon, the smartphone is not a luxury—it is their only connection to opportunity.

Imposing such a tax is like charging entry to a construction site that the government claims to be building.

No local industry, no justification for the tax

Unlike nations that tax imports to nurture domestic manufacturing, Cameroon produces no mobile phones and has no assembly plants in development. Citizens have no alternative but to import devices—and now, to pay a surcharge simply to use them.

There is no economic logic here—only revenue extraction. When a country lacks production capacity, taxing imports does not create jobs or stimulate industry. It only increases costs for consumers and widens the digital divide.

With no local alternative and no plan to develop one, this tax does not protect anything—it only takes.

Where does this end? The next target could be laptops

If smartphones are now subject to a 33.33% tax, what prevents government from extending this logic to laptops, tablets, or other essential digital tools? Each new tax deepens inequality between those who can afford connectivity and those who cannot.

Digital inclusion is not achieved by making technology more expensive. On the contrary, it requires reducing costs and expanding access. Other African nations are moving in that direction—Cameroon risks moving backward.

A connected citizen is a productive one. A digitally included population fuels economic growth. This is not speculation—it is a documented reality in every major study on digital transformation across Africa.

By making mobile phones more expensive, Cameroon is making itself less competitive. If this policy spreads to other devices, the nation risks surrendering its digital future.

A choice between progress and regression

Cameroon stands at a crossroads. It can follow the path of nations that have embraced digital inclusion as a driver of economic progress. Or it can choose a path of exclusion—one where access to technology is reserved only for those who can pay extra for the privilege.

There is still time to reverse course. The government can pause this tax, review its impact, and align its policies with the digital aspirations it claims to champion. The alternative is clear: a future where connectivity is a privilege, not a right—and one where Cameroon falls further behind in the digital economy.