Lansana Gagny Sakho, a prominent figure in the Kiiraay party led by President Bassirou Diomaye Faye, has leveled sharp criticism at his former ally, Ousmane Sonko. Speaking during a televised interview, the chairman of the APIX board revealed why he distanced himself from Sonko, while reaffirming his commitment to Senegal’s republican institutions.

Rejecting power for principles

In the aftermath of Senegal’s political transition, Sakho recounted turning down a high-profile ministerial appointment in the water and sanitation sector. His decision, he explained, stemmed from an unwavering dedication to his core values over political favors. « I prioritized my principles over positions. That choice allowed me to leave with integrity. From the start, I chose the Republic over personal gain, » he declared.

A fundamental divide over governance

Sakho’s remarks underscore a deep ideological rift between himself and Sonko. He accused the opposition leader of consistently undermining state authority, particularly through public statements made during President Faye’s official visits to the United States and China. These remarks, Sakho argued, not only undermined the government’s credibility but also embarrassed the Head of State. « True leadership is about reinforcing institutions, not fracturing them. Sonko never embraced that vision, » he asserted.

Despite acknowledging past challenges on both sides, Sakho highlighted notable progress, especially within the justice system. He praised recent reforms as a step toward strengthening the rule of law, contrasting Sonko’s confrontational approach with a more constructive vision for governance.

Justice under pressure: transparency and independence

The former close associate of Sonko also addressed recent changes at the Ministry of Justice. He referenced testimony from the outgoing justice minister, Ousmane Diagne, who denied any external manipulation. Sakho dismissed this claim, suggesting the move was intended to install a more compliant figurehead to sway magistrates. « The attempt to control the judiciary failed. Magistrates are not puppets—they uphold the law, not personal agendas, » he emphasized. To Sakho, the realities of governance differ starkly from the opposition’s rhetoric, where power is often misrepresented as mere influence.